Let's try the technique on a few examples:
Solution:
First, we can find the value of the deceleration
a. The figure below describes
what happens as a picture.
The equation for motion
that relates acceleration, velocity, and distance is
| v2 | = v02 - 2a(50 m) ==> |
| a | = (v2 - v02)/[(-2)(50 m)] |
| = ((16 m/s)2 - (24 m/s)2)/[(-2)(50 m)] | |
| a | = 3.2 m/s2 |
| v02 = 0 | = v2 - 2ax ==> |
| x | = v2/ 2a |
| = (16 m/s)2/ 2(3.2 m/s2) | |
| x | = 40 m |
| v = 0 | = v0 - at ==> |
| t | = v0/a |
| = (24 m/s)/(3.2 m/s2) | |
| t | = 7.5 s |
You can play around with this type of setup interactively using
this
Java applet.
Solution:
where va is the instantaneous velocity of the
ball at point a and vb is its velocity at
point b. Since the ball is traveling downward, its
acceleration due to gravity increases the speed as it
goes down and va < vb. The
same effect demands that vb < vc.
Since c and g are on horizontal ground, vc = vg
and the distance d satisfies the equation
Therefore, ½ (va + vb)t1 =
vct2.
We want to know whether t2 is greater than,
less than, or equal to t1. Mathematics gives
us the answer. Since, for any d > 0 we must have
va < vb, then
½ (va + vb) < vb <
vc, so t2 must be less than
t1. The answer is a.
If the pot takes a time t to pass from the top to the
bottom of the top floor window, the time it will take to drop
from the top to the bottom of the next window down is

As it slides, at some time the ball passes between
points a and b. Still later, the ball passes between points
c and g. Both points a and b and c and g are separated by a
distance d. Neglecting any air resistance, is the time
it takes for the ball to go from a to b
We have to make use of one of the equations for motion. The
simplest to use in this case is that the distance d must
satisfy the equation

While we could find the answer to the first question easily, the second and third were uncertain until we made use of what we understood about the equations for motion. Certainly the flower pot problem is impossible to intuit even though we can visualize very well what happens to the flower pot. The lack of a firm understanding of how to calculate this kind of motion led to continual attempts to better understand motion. When Galileo first proposed a new philosophy for science, that of experimentation as the only means of discovering the way nature works, he took it to heart by completely re-examining the concept of motion. To be precise in a scientific sense you must have definitions or descriptions of physical phenomena which are practical (i.e. useful in describing many physical phenomena) and readily understood in terms of mathematics.
The logical starting point for describing motion is to define first
what we mean by saying that an object "has moved" and then to
relate the amount of movement to the time over which it takes place.
Therefore, we described "has moved" as a change in position or a
displacement. Symbolically, we relate the
position of object relative to an origin of a coordinate system.
Along one dimension, for example, the initial position of an object
might be listed as x0. If we later observe the object
at a different position x1 relative to the same
origin as before, then x1 - x0 is the displacement.
The time over which this displacement takes place is usually referred
to as just t since the starting time of the observation (at least for
motion) is never important. So, Galileo quantifies the amount of
motion that occurs as
where vavg stands for the
average velocity.
Since we often find that the "motion" of an object also changes with
time, it is practical to also define the
acceleration as
Here we must be careful to distinguish between vavg and the v used in the acceleration definition. The instantaneous velocity is defined as the derivative of displacement with respect to time. More about that later.
These definitions of acceleration, velocity, and displacement are
connected through mathematics in what are called the
equations for motion:
| x = ½ (v + v0)t |
| v = v0 + at |
| x = x0 + v0t + ½ at2 |
| v2 = v02 + 2a(x - x0) |
One thing you can not forget is that these equations are only valid if the acceleration, a, is constant for the entire time interval for which you use them.
To make use of these equations to answer the questions above, let's look at what these equations do best: predict the motion or displacement for the future based on what we have determined about what influences the motion. In many problems the main "influencer" of motion is gravity. Gravity provides a constant acceleration of magnitude g = 9.8 m/s2 directed towards the center of the earth (downward in almost every case we will consider until near the end of the course). However, any case of constant acceleration can be handled by these equations.
Consider the case of the flowerpot problem. Here is the solution.
This is a tough problem but it's indicative of several skills you need to adopt to approach problems on motion. First, we note that the flower pot is accelerating as it goes down so we expect that the time to pass the top window will be greater than the time to pass the bottom window since the window distances are the same (namely, h) while the velocity of the plot during the whole time it passes the bottom window is higher than any velocity it reaches while passing the top window. Therefore, answer a is excluded before we even begin.
To find a value for t, the time necessary to fall past
the top window, we use one of the equations for motion as
applied to the picture below
| y1 - y01 = h | = v01t1 + ½ gt12 |
where t1 = t as described in the problem,
y1 is the vertical position of the bottom of the top
window, y01 is the vertical position of the top of
the top window, v01 is the speed of the pot when
it reaches the top of the top window, and g is the acceleration
due to gravity. To find v01, we use an equation
for motion which relates the velocity at the roof to the
velocity at the top of the top window.
Our original equation is a quadratic equation so its solution is
Notice that we chose the minus sign in choice between plus and minus in the numerator since only a positive time makes physical sense for this problem.
We use the same approach for the bottom window. The only
difference is that the initial velocity at the top of the
bottom window (which we will call v02) is greater
than v01. However, we find it in the same manner,
by relating it to the initial velocity of zero from the roof
The time to fall past the second window is
The ratio of t2 and t1 is the
answer we originally set out to determine, so
This ratio is roughly 2/3, so answer b is closest.
Hits since 9/10/99: