As with the case of the electric field, we hypothesize the existence of such a field as a way of explaining action at a distance in which objects exert forces on each other without direct mechanical contact. As it is easy to distinguish between gravitational and electrical forces (and hence the nature of the field produced was originally hypothesized as being quite different in nature: electric fields act only on electric charges, gravitational fields produce forces only on mass, etc.), so too were magnetic fields and electric fields thought to be very different. After all, the nature of the forces produced are very different as we will see. However, there is a very important reason for thinking, before we know very much about magnetic fields, that they are closely linked with electric fields. Although this could not be known before the atomic theory of matter was believed and the basic constituents of atoms discovered, magnetic forces act only on electric charges as there are no confirmed observations of magnetic charges. The fact that magnetic fields exert forces on electric charges at all is a clue that somehow electricity and magnetism share a deep bond. To understand that bond, we need to explore thoroughly the properties of the magnetic field.
Experimentally, to isolate the nature of the magnetic field, we need to start, as with the electric field, with the simplest thing you can act on, namely a particle. The behavior of magnetic forces is best indicated by how a charged particle behaves in the presence of such a field (we will deal with the question of how the field is produced in the first place later). To see this, explore with the Java applet below.
Figure 7.1: The force on a charged particle with a velocity v.
In the applet, a charged particle moves in the presence of a magnetic
field that is perpendicular to the page. If the particle stops its
motion, the magnetic force on it is zero. This is true independent
of the direction or magnitude of the magnetic field. The mathematical
description of the force due to the magnetic field is
| (7.1.1.1) |
The circular path seen in the applet results because the force is always
perpendicular to the velocity (and also to the B field direction).
If the velocity magnitude and B are constant, then the path
of the particle is a circle since the force, and hence the acceleration,
of the particle is always perpendicular to its path and constant
in magnitude. In this case, we satisfy the centripetal condition in
that,
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
In the earliest studies of magnetic fields, individual charged particles were not known. The properties of magnetic fields and forces were studied using the effects of fields on current distributions. If we have a bunch of charges flowing through a straight wire of length L, then the net force is

where the direction of L is the same as the direction of the current.
We can apply the above formulas to the more general case of
current distributions of arbitrary shape by breaking any line
of current into infinitesimal lengths and integrating over
them to find the net force,
| (7.1.2.3) |


The two straight pieces are identical as far as
how the magnetic field interacts with them to
produce a force. These forces have directions as
shown in the figure due to the right-hand rule.
Their magnitudes are
| (7.1.2.4) |

As can be seen from the figure, if we choose symmetrical
positions for ds above and below the midpoint of the
semicircular loop, we find that the y components of the
force produced cancel while the x components add. Thus,
for each infinitesimal length ds we wish to find
| (7.1.2.5) |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| (7.1.2.7) |
We can generalize the above result to take into account any arbitrary shape of current distribution. For example, consider the following figure where some arbitrarily shaped wire takes a current i from point a to point b in a magnetic field B which has constant magnitude and direction perpendicular to the plane containing i.

The problem is not as difficult as it might at first appear. Consider any particular piece of the wire.

In breaking this distribution into infinitesimal lengths, dl,
if we note that we are free to do this such that dl has
components that are both perpendicular and parallel to the line
between points a and b (we called these the y and x axes, respectively),
then note that the contributions on the force due to the y components
will cancel. Why? Note that in going from a to b, our net
displacement is only along x (remember: we have chosen the x axis to
lie along the line between a and b). Hence, any +y displacement
must eventually be countered with a -y displacement that cancels
it. Since the magnetic force on any +y displacement is opposite
in direction to that on any -y displacement, the integral over
i*dlyB must be zero. Hence, we have a non-zero contribution
only from the i*dlxB components. We note that the B
field is perpendicular to both the x and y components. Hence
our result is
| (7.1.3.8) |
Send comments to larryg@upenn5.hep.upenn.edu.
This page was last modified on 02/23/2003 at 11:57:19 (EST).
Current date/time is Friday, 10-Feb-2012 00:08:29 EST
[an error occurred while processing this directive]