Chapter 9
Electromagnetic Induction
9.1 Faraday's Law
9.1.1 Observation of Induction - Lenz's Law
Symmetry in nature predicts that, if a magnetic field
acting on a loop of conductor carrying a current can
produce a torque on the loop (assuming that the magnetic
moment of the loop is not aligned with the field), then
a torque acting on a conducting loop in a magnetic field
should produce a current.

Figure 9.1: Symmetry in producing a torque for a loop with
an externally maintained current going through
it is balanced in nature by having an externally
applied torque on a conducting loop produced a
current in the opposite direction.
Note that the symmetry cannot be "perfect" in that
the direction of the current that is induced in the
loop due to the externally maintained torque must be
opposite to the direction of current that would create
a torque in that direction. This is necessary due to
energy conservation. If the effect happened as in our
first case (externally maintained current), then more
current would go through the loop and the induced
torque would increase. This violates energy conservation
as the change in angular position due to the external
torque would induce still more change in angular position.
Hence we note that if the effect of induced current does
take place, the current must be induced in a direction
that opposes the external torque that causes it.
Faraday was the first to show that this induced current
effect does happen. In studying the effect, we find that
the magnitude and direction of the induced current effect
is due to a change in the magnetic flux through an area
in space. This effect is referred to as
electromagnetic induction
and the quantitative description of the effect is
Faraday's Law.
Specifically, Faraday's Law states that
In other words, Faraday expressed his effect by saying
that the magnitude of the EMF induced by any change of
magnetic flux is proportional to the magnitude of the
change in magnetic flux. The induced EMF is what causes
the current to flow. To correspond to the necessity of
energy conservation, the direction of the EMF must be such
that the induced current would oppose the change in the
magnetic flux. This was best expressed by H.F.E. Lenz
in Lenz's Law
which can be succintly stated as:
The direction of any magnetic induction effect must oppose
the cause of the effect.
The easiest way to generate a static picture of this is to
observe the four cases below of a bar magnet being pushed
toward and away from a conducting loop as shown in
figure 9.2.
The current created by the induced EMF must oppose the
change in each case.

Figure 9.2: A stationary conducting loop with a bar magnet
that can be alternately pushed toward or away
from the loop with either of two orientations of
the poles (i.e. North pole toward the loop or
away from it).
Make sure you understand
figure 9.2.
It shows, in each case, how the induced magnetic field from
the induced current (which comes from the induced EMF assuming
the loop has some amount of resistance) opposes the change in
magnetic flux. Since magnetic flux is a scalar, it might be
difficult to think of a "direction" for it, but the sign of the
flux depends on the arbitrary convention for the sign for
area, A. Once that is set, then the dot
product of B and A gives
the positive or negative sign for the flux. The negative sign
in Faraday's Law then gives the appropriate sign for the
direction of the induced EMF. In the first case of
figure 9.2,
the induced current creates an induced field which points
opposite to the external magnetic field from the bar magnet
since the flux going down through the loop is increasing with
time. For the third case, the induced current creates an induced
field which points opposite to the external magnetic field since
the flux pointing up through the loop is increasing. Verify that
the second and fourth cases shown make sense to you following the
same argument.
The importance of Faraday's effect is hard to overestimate.
Most of the world runs on electricity generated as a result
of it.
9.1.2 Faraday's Law Applied
If we consider the case for a conducting bar sliding over rails
in the presence of a magnetic field, we have a good case for
examining both Lenz's Law and considering a quantitative
example of Faraday's Law. Figure
9.3 shows the situation. To see a dynamic view of the
effect, go to the following
Java applet. It's based on the following image of what
happens as a bar slides across two rails in the presence of
a magnetic field.

Figure 9.3: A conducting bar slides on frictionless conducting
rails in the presence of a magnetic field pointing
out of the page.
- Problem 1:
- Find the magnitude and direction of the
current induced in the sliding bar of
figure 9.3 assuming
that the magnitude of the magnetic field, the
resistance R and the speed v of the sliding
bar are all known for some instant of time. Also
find the magnitude of the minimum external force
needed to keep the sliding bar in motion at constant
speed (assume no friction is acting).
- Solution:
- First, note that the area defined by the
rails and the region to the left of the
sliding bar is given at any instant of time by
A = Lx where L is the length across the rails
and x is the position of the bar relative to the
left edge of the circuit. Therefore, the time
rate of change of the magnetic flux through this
area is
|
|
dFB dt
|
= B |
dA dt
|
= BL |
dx dt
|
= BLv |
| (9.1.2.2) |
Therefore, the magnitude of the induced EMF in the
bar is
The direction of this EMF has to be down the bar
as shown in the figure since we wish to have a
current in the bar whose magnetic field points
down through the area to the left of the bar
(verify that this is true by use of the modified
right-hand rule applied to the downward current
shown in the figure). This EMF opposes the increase
in the flux by attempting to decrease the net field
through the area A. The magnitude of the current
induced is
The external magnetic field exerts a force on this
current, Finduced =
ILB, directed to the left
(again, you should check this with the right-hand
rule) so there must be an external force
Fext = ILB in order to maintain constant
velocity for the sliding bar. Therefore,
Note also that the direction is entirely consistent
whether you consider the area to the left of the
bar as increasing with time or the area to the right
of the bar as decreasing with time (check to make
sure that you agree that the current induced should
point down the bar in either case).
- Problem 2:
- In figure
9.4,
a conducting bar slides frictionlessly upward under
the influence of some external force (not shown).
Neglect gravity and find the current (direction and
magnitude) induced in the bar assuming that the
velocity of the bar is constant and known, and that
the magnetic field magnitude and resistance
of the bars is known.

Figure 9.4: A conducting bar with resistance R sits on frictionless
conducting rails and is pulled upward at constant velocity.
- Solution:
- We need to specify the area contained by the sliding
bar and the rails. Let's choose the area contained
below the bar. Specify the bar position as y above
the vertex of the rails and w as the distance from
the rail to the midpoint of the bar along the bar
(see figure
9.5).

Figure 9.5: Induced current for the problem shown in
figure 9.4.
Trigonometry tells us that
thus the area beneath the sliding bar is
|
A = 2 |
æ ç
è
|
1 2
|
wy |
ö ÷
ø
|
= w y = y2tan |
q 2
|
. |
| (9.1.2.7) |
We first note that this area is increasing with
time, thus the induced EMF and hence the induced
current in the sliding bar must be to the left.
The magnetic field due to the induced current then
points up through area A and opposes the increased
flux as the area increases.
We can now find the induced current in the bar
- Problem 3:
- Suppose a conducting loop with width w, length
l, and resistance R is falling, due to
gravity, in a non-uniform magnetic field
pointed into the page. The magnitude of the
magnetic field is characterized by
as shown in figure
9.6. Find the terminal velocity for the loop.

Figure 9.6: A rectangular conducting loop falls in a non-uniform
magnetic field. The induced current produces a force
that opposes the motion.
- Solution:
- We see that the non-uniform magnetic field
means that the magnetic flux into the page
through the loop increases with time. The
flux at any instant with the position of the
center of mass of the loop at y is
|
|
|
|
|
ó õ
|
y+w/2
y - w/2
|
(B0y¢)·l dy¢ |
| |
|
|
B0l. |
y¢ 2 2
|
ê ê
ê
|
y+w/2
y-w/2
|
|
| |
|
|
|
B0l 2
|
[(y + w/2)2 - (y - w/2)2] |
| |
|
| (9.1.2.10) |
|
The induced EMF, according to Faraday's
Law, has magnitude as follows.
with vy being the instantaneous velocity
of the center of the loop. The direction of
the EMF should be counter-clockwise so as to
oppose the flux increase as the loop falls.
If the loop has resistance R, then the current
through the loop is counter-clockwise with
magnitude
|
Iinduced = |
|e| R
|
= |
B0lw R
|
vy |
| (9.1.2.12) |
The net force on the loop, assuming equilibrium,
i.e. the loop is at its terminal velocity, is
given by the vector sum of the gravitational
force and the magnetic forces acting on the
top and bottom segments of the loop. Note that,
by symmetry, the force on the two sides of the
loop must cancel (see
figure 9.7).

Figure 9.7: The forces acting due to gravity and the magnetic forces
on the induced current in the loop falling through a
non-uniform magnetic field.
At equilibrium, i.e. when the loop falls at
constant speed vy, we have
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
IinducedlB0ybot - IinducedlB0ytop |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| (9.1.2.13) |
|
Send comments to larryg@upenn5.hep.upenn.edu.
This page was last modified on 03/20/2003 at 20:02:40 (EST).
Current date/time is Monday, 23-Nov-2009 11:25:21 EST
07846 hits since